Justinian contributed greatly to the radical reorganization of public administration - a perennial public demand that led to riots, most famous of which was the Nika revolt in 532. Justinian's legislative work was an important contribution to the internal reorganization of the Byzantine Empire. The emperor made a series of reforms in the public sector after 535, most important among them the elimination of redundant posts in public agencies, severe penalties for buying out public offices, as well as a series of instructions regarding the lawful exercise of power and the appropriate conduct for Empire officers as well as the strict punishment of infringements in public administration.

At the same time, Justinian brought about a great change in the way Byzantine provinces were governed. Provinces were ruled by two officials - one civil and one military - since Diocletian and, most regularly, since Constantine the Great. This system was marred by shortcomings and inefficiency during periods of unrest, when immediate and drastic measures were required. There had been cases when decisions had been taken by local military commanders in Syria or Palestine. Justinian contributed to the change of this system when - through a series of Novels - he gave both civil and military authorities to military commanders.

Justinian's intervention regarding the issue of large property - an old issue for the Empire - was also important. The emperor tried to limit the power of large landowners and the exploitation of small independent farmers through a series of measures. The "Novel" of 536 instructed province commanders to take strong measures against liberties by the "strong ones" - as they are called by the sources - even to use military force. Yet this continued to be one of the most acute problems throughout the Byzantine period.

Special reference is due not only to Justinian's defensive and fortification works but also to his public utility works, such as baths, aqueducts, bridges, as well as church building - with most prominent example Saint Sophia, in Constantinople.

Public Administration

Controlling the entire public machinery, the emperor was at the top of the Byzantine Empire administrative hierarchy. Whereas in Roman years the Empire was divided in large provinces governed by the Senate or imperial commissioners, in early Byzantine times there were very few administrative districts, called eparchotites. Provincial administration in Early Byzantine Period was divided into 120 provinces, which in the 4th century were divided into 15 commands and these in turn into four large administrative units. A praetorian prefect was in charge of each administrative unit, the vicar of each command - an office abolished by Justinian - and the archon of each province. These were all high-ranking public officials with administrative, juridical, financial and legal authorities.

A group of agencies performed the central administration of the Empire, presided over by the magister officiorum. The imperial post, guard, court events, communication with foreign diplomatic missions as well as control of the borders, public road transportation and control of commanders in frontier territories, all were part of the jurisdiction of this single person. He also oversaw the command of the center and of the provinces.

An experienced legislator, quastor sacri palatii was today's minister of justice, assisting the emperor in legislative and juridical duties.

The komes sacrum largitionum, the count of sacred largesse, was in charge of the fiscal sector. The komes rerum privatarum was responsible for royal real estate property. In charge of court services, the praepositus sacri cubiculi was an important officer who rose above the other four in hierarchy since the 5th century.

The command of Constantinople was assigned to the eparch of the city - an office that already existed in Rome. His responsibilities were similar to those of today's mayors, and they expanded over time to include juridical duties as well as the control of commerce and professional organizations.

A characteristic feature of Byzantine administration was that many authorities were concentrated in the hands of a few people, which made it difficult to monitor them. That is why many independent agencies with limited authorities were established in the 6th century. Moreover, Justinian encouraged the militarization of public administration in the provinces.