| Justinian contributed greatly to the radical reorganization of public
administration - a perennial public demand that led to riots, most
famous of which was the Nika revolt in 532. Justinian's legislative
work was an important contribution to the internal reorganization of the
Byzantine Empire. The emperor made a series of reforms in the public
sector after 535, most important among them the elimination of redundant
posts in public agencies, severe penalties for buying out public
offices, as well as a series of instructions regarding the lawful
exercise of power and the appropriate conduct for Empire officers as
well as the strict punishment of infringements in public administration.
At the same time, Justinian brought about a great
change in the way Byzantine provinces were governed. Provinces were
ruled by two officials - one civil and one military - since Diocletian
and, most regularly, since Constantine the Great. This system was marred
by shortcomings and inefficiency during periods of unrest, when
immediate and drastic measures were required. There had been cases when
decisions had been taken by local military commanders in Syria or
Palestine. Justinian contributed to the change of this system when -
through a series of Novels - he gave both civil and military
authorities to military commanders.
Justinian's intervention regarding the issue of large property - an
old issue for the Empire - was also important. The emperor tried to
limit the power of large landowners and the exploitation of small
independent farmers through a series of measures. The "Novel"
of 536 instructed province commanders to take strong measures against
liberties by the "strong ones" - as they are called by the sources -
even to use military force. Yet this continued to be one of the most
acute problems throughout the Byzantine period.
Special reference is due not only to Justinian's defensive and
fortification works but also to his public utility works, such as baths,
aqueducts, bridges, as well as church building - with most prominent
example Saint Sophia, in Constantinople.
Public Administration
Controlling the entire public machinery, the emperor was at the top
of the Byzantine Empire administrative hierarchy. Whereas in Roman years
the Empire was divided in large provinces governed by the Senate or
imperial commissioners, in early Byzantine times there were very few
administrative districts, called eparchotites. Provincial
administration in Early Byzantine Period was divided into 120 provinces,
which in the 4th century were divided into 15 commands and these in turn
into four large administrative units. A praetorian prefect was in charge
of each administrative unit, the vicar of each command - an office
abolished by Justinian - and the archon of each province. These
were all high-ranking public officials with administrative, juridical,
financial and legal authorities.
A group of agencies performed the central administration of the
Empire, presided over by the magister officiorum. The imperial
post, guard, court events, communication with foreign diplomatic
missions as well as control of the borders, public road transportation
and control of commanders in frontier territories, all were part of the
jurisdiction of this single person. He also oversaw the command of the
center and of the provinces.
An experienced legislator, quastor sacri palatii was today's
minister of justice, assisting the emperor in legislative and juridical
duties.
The komes sacrum largitionum, the count of sacred largesse,
was in charge of the fiscal sector. The komes rerum privatarum
was responsible for royal real estate property. In charge of court
services, the praepositus sacri cubiculi was an important officer
who rose above the other four in hierarchy since the 5th century.
The command of Constantinople was assigned to the eparch of the city - an
office that already existed in Rome. His responsibilities were similar
to those of today's mayors, and they expanded over time to include
juridical duties as well as the control of commerce and professional
organizations.
A characteristic feature of Byzantine administration was that many
authorities were concentrated in the hands of a few people, which made
it difficult to monitor them. That is why many independent agencies with
limited authorities were established in the 6th century. Moreover,
Justinian encouraged the militarization of public administration in the
provinces.
|